There are some photographic subjects so burdened with powerful associations that it’s difficult to see any representation of them as “art.” Take, for example, this photograph of a cat. His name is Beau. I’ve always liked this portrait, but while in the darkroom printing this negative recently, I wondered if this was art, or simply a competent photo of a handsome tabby? I think most of us would agree that a portrait can simultaneously be a representative likeness and fine art. But can a photo of a cat — any photo of any cat — dare have such lofty aspirations? Continue reading
Topics
-
Recent Posts
Recent Photos










Subscribe with RSS